<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 8bit Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.8bit.rs/blog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.8bit.rs/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:52:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Debugging SQL Express Client Sync Provider by bdrajer</title>
		<link>http://www.8bit.rs/blog/index.php/2009/05/debugging-sql-express-client-sync-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>bdrajer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.8bit.rs/blog/?p=23#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Yes, this is the &quot;special&quot; provider for hub-and-spoke and it should be significantly simpler to use than the peer-to-peer version. It was unofficial (a &quot;sample&quot; as Microsoft dubbed it) until a few weeks ago. The Microsoft Sync Framework 2.0 CTP 2 contains the release version of the provider that I would expect to be stable enough for normal use. Now, since the sample version was patched-up (using a server provider to work as a client etc.), the new version is probably fundamentally different. This means that the behaviour of my application could change if I switch to the new version. Because of this, I want to be careful about it - but for anyone who hasn&#039;t used the previous version of SQL Express sync provider, I think it would be smart to start with CTP 2 and never look back :).

UPDATE: it seems I was misled by the doublespeak of Microsoft&#039;s annoucement. There is still no official Sql Express provider. More details &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.8bit.rs/blog/index.php/2009/09/sync-framework-2-ctp2-no-sqlexpressclientsyncprovider-yet/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this is the &#8220;special&#8221; provider for hub-and-spoke and it should be significantly simpler to use than the peer-to-peer version. It was unofficial (a &#8220;sample&#8221; as Microsoft dubbed it) until a few weeks ago. The Microsoft Sync Framework 2.0 CTP 2 contains the release version of the provider that I would expect to be stable enough for normal use. Now, since the sample version was patched-up (using a server provider to work as a client etc.), the new version is probably fundamentally different. This means that the behaviour of my application could change if I switch to the new version. Because of this, I want to be careful about it &#8211; but for anyone who hasn&#8217;t used the previous version of SQL Express sync provider, I think it would be smart to start with CTP 2 and never look back <img src='http://www.8bit.rs/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>UPDATE: it seems I was misled by the doublespeak of Microsoft&#8217;s annoucement. There is still no official Sql Express provider. More details <a href="http://www.8bit.rs/blog/index.php/2009/09/sync-framework-2-ctp2-no-sqlexpressclientsyncprovider-yet/" rel="nofollow">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Debugging SQL Express Client Sync Provider by peter cli</title>
		<link>http://www.8bit.rs/blog/index.php/2009/05/debugging-sql-express-client-sync-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>peter cli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.8bit.rs/blog/?p=23#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I also am very interested in learning about the SQL Express Client Sync Provider for n-tier. I am using the june 08 custom class, which does implement important features.

Has the official versin been released yet ?
Thanks,Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also am very interested in learning about the SQL Express Client Sync Provider for n-tier. I am using the june 08 custom class, which does implement important features.</p>
<p>Has the official versin been released yet ?<br />
Thanks,Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Debugging SQL Express Client Sync Provider by Johan</title>
		<link>http://www.8bit.rs/blog/index.php/2009/05/debugging-sql-express-client-sync-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.8bit.rs/blog/?p=23#comment-80</guid>
		<description>bdrajer

Are you referring to the sqlsyncprovider?
Because that one is based on peer to peer conection.

Only needing a server n-client architecture; a sqlexpressclientprovider for the older syncagent would be fine.
Because otherwise I need to make a peer to peer configuration for getting sqlexpress support.  When I only need hub and spoke :-&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bdrajer</p>
<p>Are you referring to the sqlsyncprovider?<br />
Because that one is based on peer to peer conection.</p>
<p>Only needing a server n-client architecture; a sqlexpressclientprovider for the older syncagent would be fine.<br />
Because otherwise I need to make a peer to peer configuration for getting sqlexpress support.  When I only need hub and spoke :-&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Debugging SQL Express Client Sync Provider by bdrajer</title>
		<link>http://www.8bit.rs/blog/index.php/2009/05/debugging-sql-express-client-sync-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>bdrajer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.8bit.rs/blog/?p=23#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Hi, sorry for the delay.

Since there&#039;s a new CTP of the .Net Sync Framework out that contains an official version of the SQL Express Client Sync Provider, all of this debugging info may be obsolete. On the other hand, I do intend to submit it to thorough examination once I have some spare time (the previous version is built into a live application so we have to be careful not to break something). Stay tuned :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, sorry for the delay.</p>
<p>Since there&#8217;s a new CTP of the .Net Sync Framework out that contains an official version of the SQL Express Client Sync Provider, all of this debugging info may be obsolete. On the other hand, I do intend to submit it to thorough examination once I have some spare time (the previous version is built into a live application so we have to be careful not to break something). Stay tuned <img src='http://www.8bit.rs/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Debugging SQL Express Client Sync Provider by KonstantinMiller</title>
		<link>http://www.8bit.rs/blog/index.php/2009/05/debugging-sql-express-client-sync-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>KonstantinMiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.8bit.rs/blog/?p=23#comment-61</guid>
		<description>How soon will you update your blog? I&#039;m interested in reading some more information on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How soon will you update your blog? I&#8217;m interested in reading some more information on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
